(Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here.)
A CMO I know got a 22% budget increase for 2026. Biggest raise in her tenure. When I asked how she felt about it, she paused.
"Terrified."
Not grateful. Not confident. Terrified.
She's not alone. According to Gartner's September 2025 survey, budget and resource constraints are the number one challenge for 63% of CMOs. Campaign US put it bluntly: "Marketing spend is up, but confidence is down."
More money. More worry. The math doesn't add up.
Unless you understand what's actually being measured.
Yesterday’s Results, Tomorrow’s Risk
Budgets are backward-looking. They represent what worked. A board approves a 2026 marketing budget based on 2024 performance and 2025 momentum. The money you get today is yesterday's faith.
Confidence is forward-looking. It represents what you believe will work. And CMOs see something boards don't: the playbook that got them here won't work next year.
This is the confidence gap. The distance between what the budget says about the past and what the CMO knows about the future.
Why the Gap Is Widening
Three forces are compressing CMO confidence simultaneously.
The returns are shrinking. I wrote about this personally last year: digital advertising functions as a tax. You pay it to Google, Meta, and Amazon whether you want to or not. The tax isn't optional, and it's getting worse. Gartner's 2025 CMO Spend Survey noted that "CMOs are getting less for each media dollar they spend." Ad prices rise. Attribution breaks down. The math you used to justify last year's budget doesn't hold for this year's.
The role is being unbundled. Only 58% of Fortune 500 companies now have a marketing executive reporting directly to the CEO, down from 63% last year. Only 40% are called "CMO" anymore. The rest are Chief Growth Officer, Chief Commercial Officer, Chief Revenue Officer. The budget might grow, but the seat at the table is shrinking. More than 20% of Fortune 500 companies changed their marketing leadership in the past 12 months. You can have a bigger budget and a smaller job.
The rules are changing faster than anyone can adapt. 65% of CMOs believe AI will "dramatically transform" their role within two years. That's not a prediction about efficiency gains. That's anxiety about obsolescence. Duolingo's CMO, Manu Orssaud, told Marketing Brew: "Chasing everything is a trap." But standing still isn't safe either.
The rate of change is accelerating. The ability to predict outcomes is declining. The budget goes up, but the confidence goes down.
The Confidence Equation
Think of CMO confidence as a ratio:
Confidence = (Clarity of Impact × Control of Outcomes) / Rate of Change
Clarity of Impact is whether you can prove marketing works. Attribution is fracturing. Cookies are dying. AI agents are starting to influence purchases before humans even see an ad. Can you draw a clean line from spend to outcome? Increasingly, no.
Control of Outcomes is whether you own the customer journey. But the journey now runs through platforms you don't control, algorithms you can't see, and AI intermediaries you didn't invite. The CMO's domain is being colonized.
Rate of Change is how fast everything is shifting. AI adoption in marketing has doubled since 2022, now at 17.2% and projected to hit 44.2% by 2027. Two years from now, the job won't look like it does today.
When clarity declines, control declines, and change accelerates, the denominator explodes. Confidence craters. No amount of budget fixes that math.
What Boards Don't See
The board looks at the marketing budget and sees a number. The CMO looks at the same number and sees a question: do I know what this will buy?
This is the communication gap underneath the confidence gap. Boards measure inputs. CMOs worry about outcomes. A 22% budget increase looks like a vote of confidence from one side of the table. From the other side, it looks like a larger sum to be held accountable for in an environment where accountability is getting harder.
The CMO who survives isn't the one with the biggest budget. It's the one who can explain, in language the board understands, exactly what that budget will do. Not hoped-for brand lift. Not theoretical incrementality. Specific outcomes the CFO can model.
Most can't do that. That's why confidence is low.
What Changes
The CMOs I see thriving aren't asking for more budget. They're asking for more certainty.
They're trading breadth for depth. Owning fewer channels completely rather than many channels partially. If you can prove one thing works, you have a foundation. If you can't prove anything works, no budget is big enough.
They're investing in measurement before media. The instinct is to spend first and measure later. The survivors are building attribution infrastructure before they scale spend. You can't buy confidence, but you can build it.
They're shortening feedback loops. Annual planning is dead when the landscape shifts quarterly. The CMOs with confidence are the ones who can course-correct in weeks, not months.
Budget is table stakes. Confidence comes from conviction. And conviction requires knowing what works.
Nobody's getting fired for budget size in 2026. They're getting fired for not knowing what the budget bought.
The CMO with $1 million and clarity beats the one with $5 million and questions.